Designing a blower
I bought a dust collector for $150 from Busy Bee, and looking at it, I figured the blower design wasn't optimal. I also needed a blower to blow some air through a wood stove, so that got me playing around with blower design.
I decided to experiment with an old dryer motor that I had kicking around. This motor is not very powerful and only 1750 RPM.
With my previous blower design experiments, I had a hard time sizing the impeller so the motor could spin it well. I figured a paddle with the same width and depth as the impeller, and spinning in free air might present a similar load as the impeller. So I attached a 34 cm long piece of wood and, surprisingly, the motor was able to spin it quite nicely, consuming 390 watt (vs. 158 watts no-load power draw). I don't know anything about the motor's power rating, but I was pretty sure I was well within it's load limit.
I also shot video at 30 frames per second. At 1800 rpm, the motor should also turn 30 times per second. Looking at the strobe-effect, the paddle looked like it was turning backwards at 1 turn per second, so the motor was spinning around 1740 RPM. Most four-pole induction motors (with 60 Hz mains) run around 1750 RPM fully loaded, so this seemed about right.
From previous experiments, I knew that an impeller with backward-curved vanes would be the most efficient.
I cut the curved vanes out of a solid block of maple on the bandsaw. I laid out the cut lines in CAD and printed that out so I wouldn't have to worry about inaccuracies in my marking.
I checked the balance by placing the rotor shaft hole over a marble and checking which way it would tip.
The hub is two circular pieces of Baltic birch (cut with the bandsaw table tilted), glued onto the rotor.
Testing the partially completed rotor on the motor. It spun nicely, no disaster. Spinning up a big disk at 1750 RPM is much less frightening than spinning up a big rotor at 3500 RPM.
Note that the rotor spins counter clockwise, as seen here. It's counterintuitive, but impellers are the most efficient when the vanes curve away from the direction of rotation. more on that/a>.
I started by drawing eight "spokes", and increased the radius for each spoke by equal increments.
I approximated the eight segments of the spiral as circular arcs. I did this by setting my beam compass to a radius half-way between the two radii I wanted to span. Then I drew a small arc segment from the two marked radius points in towards the center. Where the arcs intersect is the center of the circular arc segment.
In retrospect, it would have been much easier if I just made a cut-out shape of the spiral housing profile and traced that both on the back plywood and the enclosure pieces.
I figured containing the airflow would reduce power consumption a bit, but it was the same as with no cover, and slightly more than the impeller spinning in free space. I was surprised that the impeller would require more power to spin inside the enclosure.
At any rate, it was still less power than just the paddle spinning on the motor in free space, so I think the paddle is a good way to check if a motor is powerful enough for a given sized impeller.
Checking air flow via Pitot tube pressure (note piece of hose held in front of blower output). At 4 cm of pressure, that worked out to about 25 meters per second (about 90 km/hour). That works out to about 11.5 cubic meters per minute of total airflow, or 430 CFM.
Blocking the inlet, I got 95 mm of static pressure (or suction). Quite a bit more than my calculations would suggest for a 34 cm disc spinning at 1750 RPM. I was expecting about 70 mm. I think there is a lot of air that spins around the impeller, and that adds to the effective size of the spinning disk of air.
With no airflow, the motor's power draw is just 183 watts, just 25 watts over the 158 watts for the motor running with nothing attached.
I really have no use for this blower. It's far too powerful to blow air in the back of a wood stove, but with 95 mm of static pressure, it's not enough to pull air through a length of ducting and filter. It's MUCH more powerful than the blower in a clothes dryer would be, but that motor would also be spinning the drum in a dryer.
I was surprised how powerful the dryer motor is, possibly as much as 1/3 hp. I'm sure it could easily power a bandsaw, as long as it wasn't used for resawing.
It might still have some uses though, maybe for a dust collector that is designed to sit right next to a machine, or one that is designed to only pull away the fine airborne dust from a sander without trying to pull coarse shavings through a length of ductwork and cyclone.
As for the wood stove blower
I'm sure the crowd that believes two sticks rubbed together will catch fire will want to inform me that this is dangerous. These blowers don't blow into the actual fire box, just into an internal cavity to bring out more heat. And the back wall of the stove doesn't even get that hot, even without a blower. The electrical hookup here is temporary - didn't have a strain relief with me when I installed it.
Another way to make the housing
The blower was for sucking shavings from the 20" thickness planer. It wasn't meant to be a dust collector, just to move the shavings to the side instead of having them shot at me when I pulled the boards out of the planer. It wasn't powerful enough though and the planer would plug up with shavings from time to time. Looking at it now, I think it would have worked if I used a 3500 RPM motor instead of a 1750 RPM motor.
Welding smoke extractor (video only)
Mini dust collector
For single, small tools
Fun with the
Ryszard's dust collector
Measuring RPM with a spectrum analyzer app (video only)
Back to my Woodworking website.